-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
optimize radix cache. #968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kingder, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to enhance the performance of the radix_cache component by optimizing its core match function. The key change involves migrating from a standard Python loop-based comparison to a more efficient implementation utilizing torch.Tensor operations, which is designed to yield significant speed improvements for sequence matching.
Highlights
- Performance Optimization: The
matchfunction within theradix_cachemodule has been refactored to leveragetorch.Tensoroperations for more efficient comparison of numerical sequences. This change is expected to significantly improve performance, especially for larger inputs, by utilizing vectorized operations. - Code Modernization: The previous Python loop-based comparison in the
matchfunction has been replaced with a more idiomatic and potentially hardware-accelerated implementation usingtorchoperations, enhancing both performance and maintainability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request optimizes the match function in the radix cache by using vectorized PyTorch operations. I've suggested using torch.argmax instead of torch.nonzero for better memory efficiency.
| def match(t1: torch.Tensor, t2: torch.Tensor) -> int: | ||
| # Ensure same shape for comparison: flatten and get min length | ||
| t1_flat = t1.flatten() | ||
| t2_flat = t2.flatten() | ||
| min_len = min(t1_flat.size(0), t2_flat.size(0)) | ||
|
|
||
| # Compare elements and find first mismatch | ||
| diff = t1_flat[:min_len] != t2_flat[:min_len] | ||
| mismatch_indices = torch.nonzero(diff) | ||
|
|
||
| if mismatch_indices.numel() == 0: | ||
| return min_len # All matched up to min_len | ||
| else: | ||
| return mismatch_indices[0].item() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using torch.argmax instead of torch.nonzero for better efficiency. torch.nonzero creates a tensor of all indices where the condition is true, which can be memory-intensive. torch.argmax finds the index of the first True value without allocating memory for all mismatch indices.
| def match(t1: torch.Tensor, t2: torch.Tensor) -> int: | |
| # Ensure same shape for comparison: flatten and get min length | |
| t1_flat = t1.flatten() | |
| t2_flat = t2.flatten() | |
| min_len = min(t1_flat.size(0), t2_flat.size(0)) | |
| # Compare elements and find first mismatch | |
| diff = t1_flat[:min_len] != t2_flat[:min_len] | |
| mismatch_indices = torch.nonzero(diff) | |
| if mismatch_indices.numel() == 0: | |
| return min_len # All matched up to min_len | |
| else: | |
| return mismatch_indices[0].item() | |
| def match(t1: torch.Tensor, t2: torch.Tensor) -> int: | |
| t1_flat = t1.flatten() | |
| t2_flat = t2.flatten() | |
| min_len = min(t1_flat.size(0), t2_flat.size(0)) | |
| if min_len == 0: | |
| return 0 | |
| diff = t1_flat[:min_len] != t2_flat[:min_len] | |
| if not torch.any(diff): | |
| return min_len | |
| return torch.argmax(diff.byte()).item() |
Total time for 100 iterations: 0.004180431365966797 1.0978515148162842 |
No description provided.